Dataset of Human Judgements on Literal and Metaphorical Synonymyous Expressions in Discourse
This dataset contains 1,000 corpus-extracted discourses for which crowdsourced annotators provided (1) graded and binary judgements on whether they perceived the discourses as more metaphorical or more literal; (2) binary judgements on the choice between a synonymous pair of a literal and a metaphorical expression following the discourses in (1); and (3) lexical terms which triggered their binary decisions in (1). The judgements were collected and analysed within two studies in various ways.
See here on how
to obtain the data.
References:
Prisca Piccirilli, Sabine Schulte im Walde (2021)
Contextual Choice between Synonymous Pairs of Metaphorical and Literal Expressions: An Empirical Study and Novel Dataset to tackle or to address the question
In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Integrating Perspectives on Discourse Annotation (DiscAnn). Tübingen, Germany.
Prisca Piccirilli, Sabine Schulte im Walde (2022)
Features of Perceived Metaphoricity on the Discourse Level: Abstractness and Emotionality
In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). Marseille, France.